steve kiene


Saturday, December 09, 2006

104.1 The Blaze and Kamp Out for Kids

Every year (well, for the last 15 years) Tim & The Animal from The Blaze have had a 30 hour camp out to raise money for presents for less fortunate kids. This year was no different and I'm happy to report that they raised about $42,000 (without counting the proceeds from the concert on Tuesday which should put the total to around $50,000).

And, for the 15th year, the Lincoln newspaper has NOT reported on this. These guys have raised probably somewhere in the neighborhood of half a million dollars to buy toys for kids. Assuming $30 per toy, that's over 16,000 toys. Add in the toys that are donated directly, and I'll bet there have been over 25,000 toys made available to needy kids over the last 15 years. If that's not something to be reported, then I don't know what the hell is.

My first step against the TSA

So yes, I complain endlessly about commercial airline travel and the TSA. Well, unlike 99% of the people out there, I am ABLE to do something about it and therefore I AM DOING something about it.

I am getting my private pilot's license. I took my first lesson on Friday. With any luck I should be finished in mid March and then I won't need to ever go through security again at an airport. Until my plane is finished in about 16 months I'll have to rent a plane to fly, but that's fine with me.

To clarify my previous post, yes, I think the rules shouldn't apply to me. But I think the rules shouldn't apply to ANYONE. They are stupid rules that accomplish nothing useful. They won't stop a terrorist from using an explosive made of liquid. They aren't making people feel safer. As far as I can tell, those are the only two reasons for the rule. Since it's not working, why have the rule at all?

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Holiday travel

Pam and I flew from Omaha to Phoenix today and had a wonderful experience with the TSA. Apparently people are still irrationally freaked out about liquids and gels, so we went through the trouble of checking a bag with all our shampoo, etc in it. Pam left a couple of things in her purse: lipstick, hand lotion, etc. The security nazi freaked out and wouldn’t let her take it unless she had it in a ONE QUART CLEAR PLASTIC BAG. Putting it in a mesh pocket in our bag apparently is unsafe. They made her go back out, buy a plastic bag, and put the items in the bag. Now she’s safe for air travel. I hate to think what might have happened if I had just put those items in my pocket when I went through security! Would it cause the plane to crash? Would terrorists steal them and hijack the plane? I suspect none of that would have happened, because I DO take toothpaste, lip balm, etc with me in my pockets because of course they have no way to detect these things.

While I’m on the subject of air travel, do you ever wonder what would happen if you didn’t put your cell phone on “flight mode” during take-off and landing? Would the instruments on the plane go haywire and cause a disaster? Of course not- how many people do you think honestly forget to turn off their phones? I know I’ve forgotten many times. Irrational, arbitrary rules like this piss me off. When I used to run a company, I was adamant about not creating rules just for the sale of having rules. If I couldn’t rationally defend the rule, then it wasn’t going to become one. Companies typically create a rule after a problem occurs. This is stupid. It’s reactionary and serves no positive purpose. If a company has been operating just fine and then an incident occurs which requires intervention- oh, let’s say someone is leaving work too early, then creating a rule that says everyone must stay at work until 5pm is stupid. The proper thing to do is to sit down with the individual and correct their behavior. Better yet, talk to them and understand why they feel they can leave early, explain your viewpoint, and make a change together. There’s no need to create a rule that is placed on everyone. Doing so causes negative feelings from the employees who haven’t caused a problem. When you introduce a new rule, people take it personally and the feel like they are being punished, and they don’t know why.

Rules are also pointless unless there are consequences. When I was in high school I was exposed to all kinds of rules. For the most part I ignored them and did whatever I wanted. Thankfully, “what I wanted” was within a boundary that matched up fairly well with the rules. But there were some exceptions. When I did break the rules and was “caught”, nothing really happened. Ohh, they’re going to put a note in my “Record”. Big deal. What the heck are they, the U.N.? “If you do that, we’re going to be very angry and we will write you a letter!” Uhh, whatever. No consequences = no rules, plain and simple. Any parent knows this, so why do adults seem to not understand that it applies everywhere, not just in parenting.

This is enough ranting for one post. We’re about to land in Phoenix to spend Thanksgiving with Leah. It’s now time to start reflecting on the past year and to be thankful for many things.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Pam's new Jeep



Pam got a new 2007 Jeep Wrangler. She's showing off by driving places I can't go with my Mercedes. It's not a bad vehicle- not something I'd drive, but it's her's so it doesn't matter.
Now... if you tripled the horsepower then maybe...

Friday, October 20, 2006

Gotta get there faster

Now that we're building a home in Colorado, we're going to need to get back and forth in an efficient manner. Enter my newest toy, a private plane. Pam and I went to Redmond, Oregon this week to take a tour of the Lancair aircraft factory and we made the decision to purchase an aircraft. It will take only 90 minutes from takeoff in Lincoln to touchdown in Granby, Colorado thanks to a cruising speed of 370MPH.

If you're curious to see the type of aircraft we purchased, check out the company's website: http://www.lancair.com/Main/propjet.html

I hope to get my pilot's license by March of next year so I can actually FLY!

Monday, October 09, 2006

I'm building a new home



Just purchased this land in Colorado. Next spring I'll start building a house on it. Hopefully I will actually get some work done it and not get distracted by this gorgeous view.

Sunday, October 08, 2006

Saw 3

October 27th is the premiere of Saw 3. Sweet. I'll be there.

Every time Lionsgate releases a movie, I go see it. They release a lot of great horror movies and they aren't afraid to tackle a controversial movie. We need more independent producers like them.

Wifi Security

I was reading Robert Scoble's blog tonight and saw a post regarding Wifi security, or lack thereof. Someone told him that if you are sitting in a coffee shop, someone next to you can sniff your traffic and see what you are typing on IM, etc.

This is not new news. Perhaps some people didn't realize that IM messages are sent as plain text, but most people know that wireless traffic can, in many cases, be sniffed.

I've always dealt with this in a simple way: I am always connected to my corporate VPN, so all of my traffic is encrypted across the wireless network.

Let me explain in more detail:

When you connect to a VPN (virtual private network), all of your data is encrypted between your computer and the VPN server. In my case, my VPN server is located at my office. There is no way for someone to sniff my traffic over WiFi (or a wire) and see what is flowing between my computer and my VPN server. Once my traffic reaches my VPN server, it is on my corporate network and it gets to the internet from there. In essence I am "at" work with regards to traffic that goes to the internet. I am bridged from whatever location I am really at, into my office. That's the purpose of a VPN. It connects you into your network as if you were physically there.

The first thing my computer does when it connects to a Wifi network is to connect to my VPN. This ensures that all of my traffic is encrypted. Technically there is a small performance penalty for this because traffic has to "bounce" through my offfice, but it's a small price to pay for security.

Friday, June 30, 2006

Catholic priest is delusional

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/06/29/billionaires.abortion.ap/index.html

This idiot is comparing Warren Buffett to Josef Mengele? That is just plain offensive to me. I don't care what else this jerkoff has to say because he's lost all credibility with that statement.

And then Steven Mosher, President of "Population Research Institute" claims that Buffett and Gates are trying to decimate the population of the developing world by forcing abortions, sterilization, and contraception. Umm, excuse me, but that just retarded. Countries like Africa are facing an AIDS plague. The population will extinct itself without any outside help. The immense amount of money that Gates is spending is HELPING. Innoculations for children, sexual education, etc are things that help the people. Gates isn't doing anything to promote abortions or sterilization. And lastly, if this bunghole had any sort of brain, he would use the word "decimate" when he means annihilate. DECImate means to reduce by 1/10th.